Rebuild of Evangelion: 3.0 - You can (not) redo

You don't get a letter grade on it, because while it is a movie and a coherent unit, it is also part of a greater series and that series is important to its context.  So this is a bit of a different review.

Let's start by talking about Rebuild of Evangelion 1 (You are (not) alone) and 2 (You can (not) advance) real quick.

Rebuild 1 was essentially a retelling of the first six episodes of the anime with dramatically improved animation and a few minor changes.  In all, it was great.  It was what people wanted.

Rebuild 2 moved away from the original anime plotline, introducing a new pilot (Mari) and rearranging events so that certain characters were more and less important and events occurred in different order with different characters.  Relationships progressed faster, and practically every character was much more emotionally open.  Rebuild 2 was beautiful and made a number of intentionally complex and flawed characters relatable, then ended on a point of extreme shock and tension.  The end of Rebuild 2 is a total curveball for viewers of the anime.

In short, Rebuild 2 was excellent and put us in a place where we had no idea what to expect.  Rebuild 3 had a lot to do: these characters we knew very well and this situation that was completely foreign to us, and build a story we could understand out of them.  It's a tall order.  I think it succeeds, but at the cost of its non-metaphorical narrative.

Rebuild 3, for me, felt like, while it wasn't the direct expositional version of Instrumentality that the original anime had, it definitely was encouraging you to think about what each of the characters and situations represented in a symbolic framework.

And honestly, I think a lot of people won't like that, and the actual movie itself doesn't feel quite as awesome as Rebuild 2 was, though the symbolism and metaphor, a necessary part of the Evangelion franchise, were back, and strong.

Finally, Rebuild 3 ends in a very similar way to how Rebuild 2 did: a situation we, the viewers, recognize as parallel to the end of End of Evangelion, which leaves us absolutely no frame of reference for what to expect from the final installment.

I'm quite curious what the critical reception for 3 will be, I enjoyed it, but I really wonder if other people will.

Neon Genesis Evangelion

Neon Genesis Evangelion:  S

So, Evangelion was for me what Harry Potter was for a lot of kids who are slightly younger than me.  It was formative.  I saw it when I was 14, in 1998, and it was one of the first anime series I ever saw.  I was at a point in my life where I was searching for meaning, for motivation, for purpose, and I found it through the suffering and growth of another 14-year old, the boy named Shinji Ikari.

I could give a summary of Eva, or reasons to watch it, but everything I could say on those topics has already been said elsewhere on the internet.  It's too popular, too embedded in the anime-viewers' collective consciousness, even the ones who have never seen it, because of the effect it had on anime as a medium: Evangelion is almost certainly the single most influential series of all time.

For me, the thing I want to talk about is how difficult it seems to be for viewers to allow themselves to be affected by the emotional content of the story.  Eva is a series where practically all of the characters are varying degrees of unlikeable: Shinji is a passive, self-denying doormat, Rei is incapable of coherent self-expression, Asuka is an egocentric showboat, Misato is self-deceptive hypocrite, Ritsuko is a liar of outstanding proportions and Gendo is utterly lacking in compassion.  However, the power of the series comes from the viewer's ability to sympathize with these characters despite their flaws, indeed, to recognize these flaws as being human and reflected in themselves:  These people are like you, and who they are brings them pain, just like you.

I cannot count the number of times I have heard the series referred to or discussed in terms which ignore its emotional content, instead making jokes about the screen going red and Shinji screaming, dialogueless scenes, frame saving, incomprehensible philosophical pontification, or sexual subtext (or just plain text, in a few cases).  Joking about it allows the viewer to evade sympathy by treating the content as absurd or engaging in schadenfreude at the characters' expense, and that denies the emotional impact which is the core of the series' purpose.

Much like it's younger, more upbeat cousin Gurren Lagann, if Eva doesn't affect you emotionally, you're missing what the series is about.  Not everyone is interested in being affected in the violently cathartic way that Eva attempts to affect you, though, and this is probably the real reason that there are so many jokes at the series' expense: when you're watchin' anime with your friends, you don't want to have your emotional walls torn down and your mortality and purpose in life brought into question, you just want to watch the explosions and the boobs.

This is a reason why I have strongly recommended that the series be watched alone, because when viewed in a group, people are far more likely to try to appear knowledgeable, clever, or funny at the cost of sympathy and connection, without which, Eva becomes what it is most often described as: weirdly-used christian iconography peppered with sparse dialogue, technobabble and scenes of crying, screaming and giant robots fighting giant monsters (often at the same time).

But for me, and many others, that was not what Neon Genesis Evangelion was about, that was simply the context in which an empowering story about personal responsibility, identity, choice and love could occur.